You are about to leave jnjmedicaldevices.com. By clicking to continue, you will be taken to a web site governed by their own Legal and Privacy Policies.
ECHELON FLEX™ Powered Vascular Stapler
Only the ECHELON FLEX Powered Vascular Stapler with Advanced Placement Tip gives you a narrower anvil,* thinner shaft† and more articulation‡ than Endo GIA™ Curved Tip Reload with Tri-Staple™ Technology.
Incredibly Precise
Narrower anvil* and thinner shaft†. More articulation compared to Endo GIA™ Curved Tip Reload with Tri-Staple™ Technology.‡ Watch Dr. Zane Hammoud at Henry Ford Hospital perform a PV transection during a right upper lobectomy with ECHELON FLEX Powered Vascular Stapler.
ECHELON FLEX Staplers Have Been Associated with Improved Clinical and Economic Outcomes
ECHELON FLEX™ Powered Staplers vs. Medtronic non-powered staplers has been associated with reduction in hemostasis-related complications,§ shorter length of stay,¶ and improved hemostasis outcomes without increasing cost** in VATS Lobectomy (Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery).
More Flexibility During Placement
11% greater articulation in each direction‡ vs Endo GIA™ Tri-Staple™. ECHELON Flex Powered Vascular Stapler provides a span of 100° which may make it easier to access structures in the tight thoracic cavity.††
Resources
Resources
Supporting Documentation
Product Support
Achieving Optimal Performance from the ECHELON FLEX™ Powered Vascular Stapler
Product Specifications
|
Product Code |
Product Code |
Description |
|---|---|---|
| PVE35A | PVE35A | 35mm Vascular Linear Cutter |
References
* Versus leading staplers on the market as of October 2017.
† Approach angles assessed in a virtual CAD environment in the 5th intercostal space.
‡ Compared to the Endo GIA™ Curved Tip Reload with Tri-Staple™ technology. Based on articulation data from IFUs of each device.
§ Miller DL, et al. Impact of powered and tissue-specific endoscopic stapling technology on clinical and economic outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy procedures: a retrospective, observational study. Review of 1,051 cases between 2015 and 2016 from the Premier Healthcare Database (4.8% vs 14.2%; p=0.010).
¶ Miller DL, Roy S, Kassis ES, et al. Impact of Powered and Tissue-Specific Endoscopic Stapling Technology on Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy Procedures: A Retrospective, Observational Study. Adv Ther. 2018 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0679-z. Review of 3,006 cases between 2012 and 2016 from the Premier Healthcare Database (4.9 vs 5.7 days; p=0.0374).
** Miller DL, Roy S, Kassis ES, et al. Impact of Powered and Tissue-Specific Endoscopic Stapling Technology on Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy Procedures: A Retrospective, Observational Study. Adv Ther. 2018 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0679-z. Review of 1,051 cases between 2015 and 2016 from the Premier Healthcare Database. Hemostasis-related complications: 4.8% vs 14.2%; p=0.010. Transfusion: 3.0% vs 9.4%; p=0.023. Total hospital cost: $23,219 vs $25,207; p=0.242.
†† Compared to the Endo GIA™ Curved Tip Reload with Tri-Staple™ Technology. Based on articulation data from IFUs of both devices.
For complete indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and adverse reactions, please reference full package insert.
© Ethicon US, LLC. 2019. 085133-171129
For complete indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and adverse reactions, please reference full package insert.
This site is published by Ethicon US, LLC, which is solely responsible for its contents, and is intended for U.S. audiences only.
This site is intended for Healthcare Professionals. If you are a patient, it is important that you discuss information about the benefits and risks of products with your doctor.
Last updated February 20, 2019. The third-party trademarks used herein are trademarks of their respective owners. Data and usage fees may apply. See your carrier for more information.